Ahmadinejad blasts U.S. before visit

Just days before his planned trip to New York, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said he has proof the United States and Israel are linked to the world's leading terrorist organizations, according to state-run media.


"We have documents that prove (Washington) is the root of world terrorism," Ahmadinejad said in a speech in Tehran, Press TV reported. "It has been aiding and abetting extremist groups over the past years."

Ahmadinejad said his nation "cuts any hand that signs a document against Iran," according to the semi-official FARS news agency.

His remarks came as the United States pushes for new international sanctions against Iran over its refusal to halt its nuclear program.

Ahmadinejad plans to attend a United Nations summit on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which opens Monday,

The United States "is the only country to have used the atomic bomb in military conflict," Ahmadinejad said Saturday, according to Press TV. "They even admit themselves that they resorted to using (similar weapons) during the war they waged on Iraq."

The United States has not admitted using such weapons in the Iraq war.

Ahmadinejad planned to offer at the U.N. conference major proposals that would allow Iran to maintain its nuclear program, his top adviser, Mojtaba Samareh Hashemi, said, according to IRNA official news agency.
Iran insists that its program is aimed at producing nuclear energy, while Washington accuses it of seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

Ahmadinejad urged the United States to engage his government, saying that "companionship is better than confrontation," FARS reported.

His remarks came at a ceremony celebrating May Day, or International Workers' Day.
On Thursday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned Ahmadinejad in some of the Obama administration's strongest language to date.

"Iran, with its anti-Semitic president and hostile nuclear ambitions, also continues to threaten Israel, destabilize the region, and sponsor terror," Clinton said, addressing the annual meeting of the American Jewish Committee.

"The United States is committed to pursuing [a] diplomatic path," she said. "But we will not compromise our commitment to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons."

UK PM Brown makes surprise visit to Afghanistan

Prime Minister Gordon Brown paid a surprise visit to British troops in Afghanistan on Saturday, his office said.


He went to Camp Bastion, the main British base in Helmand province, as well as a police training college and a British forward operating base, or outpost, according to 10 Downing Street.

Brown's office told news outlets of his visit to Afghanistan while he was in the country but asked that it not be reported until he left.

As Brown was making his visit, the Ministry of Defence announced a British soldier had been killed in Afghanistan on Friday.

The soldier died from wounds received as a result of an explosion while he was on foot patrol near Sangin, in Helmand Province, the ministry said in a news release. The death was not connected to Operation Moshtarak, the big push against the Taliban in the south of the country, according to the ministry.

The identity of the soldier has not been released. His family has been informed of his death, the ministry said.
Brown's trip to Afghanistan came less than 24 hours after he testified in London before the country's Iraq Inquiry, where he insisted British troops in Iraq had been given all the equipment they asked for.
Lord Charles Guthrie, a former chief of the British Defense Staff, rejected those claims in a newspaper column on Saturday.

"For Gordon Brown to say he has given the military all they asked for is not true," he wrote in the Daily Telegraph. "He cannot get away with saying, 'I gave them everything they asked for.' That is simply disingenuous."

Guthrie was the country's top military officer from 1997 to 2001. Brown was chancellor of the exchequer -- the man in charge of government spending -- from 1997 until 2007, when he became prime minister. The war in Afghanistan began in October 2001. The Iraq invasion took place in March 2003.

"The Ministry of Defense received the bare minimum from the chancellor, who wanted to give the military as little as he could get away with," wrote Guthrie, who joined the House of Lords, the upper house of the British legislature, after retiring from the military. He is not associated with a political party.

Brown spent much of Friday defending military spending allowances, which have come under harsh scrutiny in Britain. Earlier witnesses have said Brown, as chancellor in the time leading up to and after the Iraq invasion, did not allow the Ministry of Defence to spend as much as was needed.

Such limits would have restricted the military's ability to buy helicopters, body armor and weapons that would have subsequently been used in Afghanistan.

But Brown said that as chancellor, he never ruled out a military option on the basis of cost.

"I said that every single request that was made for [military] equipment had to be met, and every request was met, and at any point military commanders were able to ask for equipment that they needed, and I know of no occasion when they were turned down for it," he testified.

Geoff Hoon, defence secretary at the time of the 2003 invasion, testified that Brown forced cuts that limited military spending.

"We then had to look hard at our budget and make some rather difficult cuts in the future equipment program as a result," Hoon testified.

Brown had faced increasing pressure to testify before Britain holds general elections, widely expected to be held May 6. His Labour Party faces a tight race with the opposition Conservatives.

On the invasion of Iraq itself and the British role in it, Brown said Friday the decision to go to war "was the right decision and it was for the right reasons."

The inquiry, which began last year, is expected to be the most thorough investigation yet into decisions that led up to the war and governed Britain's involvement, analysts have said.

It is not a court of law, so the inquiry cannot find anyone criminally responsible or even apportion blame. But inquiry members will be able to judge the legality of the conflict.